Olympus and Panasonic GF1 E-P1 parameter comparison

Now it is finally published the GF1, hold the person did not sell E-P1 you now have two options. But two really bad? photoreceptor-two look the same heart photoreceptor, but because the use of digital signal processors, the final picture quality should also be very different. From the book, we only know the GF1 high ISO 3200, than only to the EP now is finally published the GF1, hold back didn't sell E-P1 person you now have two options. But two really bad? photoreceptor-two look the same heart photoreceptor, but because the use of digital signal processors, the final picture quality should also be very different. From the book, we only know the GF1 high ISO 3200, than only to EP-1 of 6400 low first-order, but before seeing the picture quality compares the differences of this book is actually not very meaningful. Kit lens-GF1 is equipped with a biscuit and a variable lens, biscuit mirror is 20mm (40mm equivalent) f/1.7, no E-P1 of 17mm (34mm equivalent) wide-angle, but maximum aperture f/f 1.7 E-P1/2.8. On the other side of the 14-45 lens is changed before the GH1, no E-P1 brightest 14-42 so compact, but Panasonic's two lenses are the optical fangshou shaking. Movie mode-this is part of win, because the GF1 GF1 supports AVCHD 25/30 fps video, in archival 720p size than the Motion JPEG to E-P1 has advantages, but E-P1 is sound, the GF1 only Mono. Screen-two are 3 "of the screen, but the GF1 is 460K resolution 230K E-P1 only. Overall, the action-a little different to this part of the fall, in short the GF1 is pretty standard, but Panasonic system modeling E-P1 (in my opinion) is the classic appearance. Operational E-P1 has two wheel, the GF1 has only one, this part can be considered E-P1 dominant. Flash, viewfinder-both E-P1 most regrettable places are complements, the GF1 a built-in Flash (GN only 6) is up, the electronic viewfinder is an option, the location of the shoe, by providing a connector on the back of the signal. Size, weight-GF1 than E-P1 narrow 7mm, high 1mm, thin 0.1mm, from various sources are. And then the weight on the GF1 only 285g than E-P1 light close to 120 grams. On the one hand, can be said that the GF1 more convenient, but probably less the kind of texture E-P1. Finally, we cannot forget the two biggest difference--GF1 is lens shake, E-P1 Fangshou is fuselage CCD mobile fangshou shaking. The purpose is of course have the advantage of fuselage fangshou shaking, Panasonic developed optical fangshou shake technology for so long, in effect is a notch above. From current information on the parties, it appears that the GF1 E-P1 slightly more expensive than it would be. Dear reader, how would you choose?